Alex Rodriguez, 600th HR yesterday afternoon elicited the usual reaction from baseball scribes. You know who I’m talking about, the Ian O’Connor’s and Bob Klapisch’s, of the world amongst a cast of thousands who inevitably write, “ARod cheated the game”. “He doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame”, “He really only has 444 “clean” HRs (Pete Abraham on Twitter yesterday), etc…. However, what these moralistic writers won’t tell you is that they turned a blind eye to PED use as they applauded and extolled the virtues of McGwire, Sosa, ARod and Bonds. Publicly, writers have been aware of PEDs since October 1988, when Thomas Boswell of the Washington Post wrote the following about Jose Canseco, “the most conspicuous example of a player who has made himself great with steroids”. Did this create a huge media firestorm, as previously seen with ARod? Nope. How about after the strike of 1994?
In July ’95 Bob Nightengale’s story included a quote from then Padres GM Randy Smith saying, “we all know there’s steroid use, and it is definitely becoming more prevalent.” In that same article Nightengale quotes Tony Gwynn stating: “It’s like the big secret we’re not supposed to talk about”. Where was the media outrage back then? Where were all the holier than thou baseball columnists spewing and hand wringing for drug testing?! What were all the hard-hitting investigative reporters doing besides sticking their collective heads in the sand? That’s right…nothing.
The media now want us to believe they are outraged, that they are the moral police in place to ensure the game is “clean” and that the “truth be set free”. But they don’t really want that. They knew all along players were getting bigger, faster, were hitting the ball farther, throwing it harder, but looked the other way for 15+ years. Hypocrisy reigns supreme. They will keep HOF worthy players out of the Hall because they “cheated” the game. But didn’t the same writers cheat the game they cover and make a living from by not reporting what they knew and saw was happening? Remember, in August of 1998 when McGwire and Sosa were locked in their chase for 62 and androstenedione was discovered in McGwire’s locker? The media quickly dismissed it as a nutritional supplement as they waived their pom-poms and watched the TV ratings and revenues roll in.
So next time the media laments how “sad” they are or how “bad” this is for the game and “the kids”…remember they played as big a part as anyone in creating the situation they now condemn. When the first baseball columnist comes “clean” telling us how he/she cheated the fans and the game by concealing what they saw everyday in the clubhouse, I’ll be all ears. Until then excuse me as I attempt to block out all the white noise from the media that similar to Clemens in front of Congress “misremembers” what they know about PED usage.
Follow me on Twitter @eddieperez23
The down side is that these are the guys with the HOF votes. I happen to agree with you; because they now have egg on their faces, they’re spiting guys like McGwire and Bonds (and now A-Rod). As far as I’m concerned, all three belong in the Hall. In past eras, you had other pharmaceuticals used and players like Carlton and Seaver readily admit using them.
Baseball is just mad because the whole thing turned into a fiasco when Congress got involved. A-Rod should have another 5-8 years of play left, so say better than a decade before he’s eligible. My guess is by then this will all be water under the bridge.
Good column. Didn’t the guy who wrote about the Andro bottle in Mark McGwire’s locker get slammed by his media cohorts for doing so?
Lisa,
Thanks….yes some of the baseball writers as noted in the link below took him to task for “tarnishing” the HR chase.
http://www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services-miscellaneous-business/4674052-1.html
Ray,
Yes, since we don’t and will never know who did and who didn’t use PEDs, I would simply judge players based on their on-field performance. The baseball writers (aka moral police) as you said will keep these guys out as long as they can. My hope is as the older, more moralistic writers get replaced with younger more open-thinking voters, ARod, Bonds, Clemens, etc… will eventually get in.